Tuesday, October 30, 2007

WHAT'S THE FREQUENCY, DENNIS?
This ineffectual, brainless cretin actually has the gross effrontery to question the MENTAL HEALTH of the President of the United States?

Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich questioned President Bush's Mental health in light of comments he made about a nuclear Iran precipitating World War III. "I seriously believe we have to start asking questions about his Mental health," Kucinich, an Ohio congressman, said in an interview with The Philadelphia Inquirer's editorial board on Tuesday.

"There's something wrong. He does not seem to understand his words have real impact."


Dennis, you ignorant and pathetic dimwit, have you noticed the tinfoil hat on YOUR head? Did you consider, even for a second, the effect your ill-considered and STUPID words might have on the safety and well-being of the United States? Do you think at all?

George W. Bush is not the one whose mental health bears examination, but MOST Democrats are exhibiting a level of dementia that is truly terrifying!

Monday, October 29, 2007



CONGRATULATIONS TO THE OSU BUCKEYES ON A SUPERB SEASON - SO FAR!

Of course, if you understand the Columbus, Ohio mentality, you'd know that if Tressel doesn't win the Michigan game, he'll be booed at the first game of next season, even though the team is 9-0 right now!

Thursday, October 25, 2007


HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO THE SPAWN OF SATAN!

You can go here to offer your greetings. Remember, be civil. I wished her plummeting poll numbers and a rapid decline into obscurity together with her serial philandering husband.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

AW HECK, ONE LAST TIME!
The artist's heart was in the right place (well, the left place actually) but I don't think he did as good a job as he should have. For example, the ankles aren't accurately portrayed. But the complete insanity of the eyes is quite effective and accurate!

Monday, October 22, 2007

YOU BET I DETEST HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

However, and despite the fact that I have a few of the less flattering ones stored on my hard drive, I’m starting to think that the endless focus on Mrs. Clinton’s beauty – or lack thereof – is small-minded and demeaning to those who make the comparison, more so than to Mrs. Clinton.

I mean, let’s be honest, it’s FUN. She is capable of making some of the most astonishingly unattractive faces and there’s a picture floating through the blogsphere where she clearly is picking her nose! Yuck!

But I think – and of course some will likely disagree with me – that it is what’s in Mrs. Clinton’s brain and heart that deserves our intense focus. I truly don’t care when she looks “rode hard and put up wet” – as she frequently does.

Let’s focus instead on Mrs. Clinton’s core beliefs. These beliefs would, if fully known, cause most sane voters to reject her candidacy. And in the end, preventing Hillary Rodham Clinton from ever again entering the White House – even as a guest – is the most important task to accomplish.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

I REALLY DON’T MEAN TO BE RUDE . . .

And, shy as I am, I don’t like to ask pointed questions, but - - -

WHAT IN HELL HAS THE CURRENT CONGRESS ACCOMPLISHED?

The president is not fond of using the power of the veto, and yet that seems to be all he has been forced to do lately. And has the House managed to override ANY of those vetoes? Not so much!

I don’t think this will gain traction for a long while, considering the stranglehold the leftwingnuts have on the mainstream media, but it is entirely possible that the self-proclaimed “Most Powerful Woman in the World”, La Pelosi, is on track to be named the WORST SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE in the history of this nation.

As near as I can tell, about all the current Congress (both sides of the aisle – don’t want to be accused of committing a hate crime after all) is comprised of is dopes, dimwits, traitors and loons!

At this, one of the most DANGEROUS times in our nation’s history, do we really need to be so ill-served?

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

OVERHEARD ON A D.C. STREET CORNER


I had a very high stress day yesterday - too much work, not enough time - so I slipped out for a very rare indulgence: a cigarette break! And there, standing on the corner of 12th and Pennsylvania Avenue, an attorney from another law firm joined me in observing several beggars pass by, gazing at us hopefully!

Finally, he turned to me and said (I'm not kidding): "On my next vacation I'm going to Calcutta - get away from the beggars!"

Monday, October 15, 2007

FAREWELL (KIND OF) SWEET TIM!


When I moved on 10/5 into my new house, something rare and precious and utterly beloved did NOT move with me. I'm referring to the beloved little bluepoint Siamese named Tim. The reasons included: 1. He is madly in love with Linda; 2. Linda is madly in love with Tim; 3. Zeus is madly in love with Tim; 4. Tim is ecstaticly happy at Linda's house; 5. I knew I could see Tim whenever I wanted and 6. I wasn't sure Tim was safe at my house.

This may have been the most difficult decision I've ever made but since Tim is thriving at Linda's house and is, as mentioned, head-over-heels in love with her (actually HE has HER wrapped around his dainty little paw) and I could not, in good conscience, surrender his best interests to my own selfishness.

Meanwhile, Sam's entire crabby disposition is rapidly evaporating since he has had me all to himself. He has also found himself a lady friend, albeit at a distance. There's a very lovely lady tuxedo cat who traverses my back yard from time to time - and Sam has been known to mewl at the window upon sighting her! I have assured him that she is unaware of and unimpressed by his importunings. Over the weekend, people kept coming by to fix things or bring things over or whatever - Sam was either cordial or completely oblivious to their presence, a major relief to me.

Unpacking is a pain in the fundament. However, it has occurred to me that there actually is NO schedule I need to observe - so I'm doing it one load of laundry and one box per evening - naturally more on weekends. If I could just find the can opener and my spatulas and knives, I'd be a happy woman!

Friday, October 12, 2007

IT HAD TO HAPPEN!


Now that Al Gore has won the Nobel Peace Prize for his global-warming-faux-religious crusade, it was inevitable that some Democrats would begin to urge Mr. Gore to run for the presidency – against Hillary Rodham Clinton. It has been clear for some time that a lot of Dems are not exactly doing backflips over having Mrs. Clinton as a frontrunner! There are a lot of Democrats who don’t like the smell of sulfur any better than we do!

And I wouldn’t count Gore out, folks! In the early 1960s, Richard Nixon had become a national joke, and then he was elected President. I don’t know if Mr. Gore has spent the time cultivating the grassroots functionaries of the Democratic Party to the extent that Mr. Nixon did but he may have done so.

And if I had to choose between eyes-spinning-counterclockwise Albert Gore, Jr. and that despicable Spawn of Satan – I don’t know - who would be the most dangerous? I know – a ticket comprised of both of them! THAT would be more dangerous.

Please, let’s pray that God continues to bless America. I know we’ve probably tried His patience a lot in the past 20 years – but let’s ask for one last kindness from Him even though we probably don’t deserve it.
GREAT ADVICE!


The brilliant Lorie Byrd hits a grand slam home run in her intelligent and well reasoned article "How to Lose in 2008 and Beyond" available here.
AL GORE WINS NOBEL PEACE PRIZE


Yawn!

The prize means little when you consider that it has also been given to one of the more murderous terrorists of the 20th century (Arafat) and the worst president of the 20th century (Carter).

Put it on your resume guys, if you must, but do not expect me to be impressed because the Nobel Peace Prize is meaningless when it is awarded to people who promote junk science, terror or just plain stupidity!

And speaking of Jimmy Carter - why didn't Wolf Blitzer challenge Carter's lies during their CNN interview? Why am I even asking this stupid question?

Thursday, October 11, 2007

OOPS – SHE’S DONE IT AGAIN!


When it comes to manipulating the MSM to her advantage, there is no politician as adept as Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-Hades). Just about two weeks ago, Senator Clinton casually commented that “I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time.” an idea that did not actually originate with Mrs. Clinton, but rather more than 30 years ago with George McGovern who proposed a $1,000 bond to each baby born and was ridiculed by his own party as well as the Republicans.

Very quickly, Senator Clinton’s campaign made it clear that this wasn’t a policy position, but rather that Mrs. Clinton was sending up a trial balloon “idea” – although when she made the remarks during an address to them, the Congressional Black Caucus seemed to like what she had to say.

Some have claimed that this was Mrs. Clinton’s first mistake of the 2008 campaign and that the quick lockdown on the subject showed that her campaign is highly focused and disciplined.

I don’t think it was a mistake at all. I think it was a deliberately provocative remark that accomplished precisely what Senator Clinton wanted accomplished – lots of press attention, both electronic and print media.

Which is why I say that she is the most manipulative and cynical politician extant today.

Dear merciful heavens, how I dislike this corrupt and dishonest crone! And how I fear the damage she could easily cause our beloved nation.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

CHRYSLER UNION WALKS OUT!


In one of the more short-sighted, boneheaded, just plain STUPID moves I have seen of late, the union autoworkers have walked off the job and gone on strike against Chrysler Corporation.

Here's a tip:

1. You are already paid quite generously for the work you do.

2. Your benefit package is second to none.

3. American auto makers are teetering on the brink of extinction because they are being priced out of the market by non-union foreign automakers who produce a car of exceptional quality (frequently here in America) without the added expense of paying exhorbitant wages and benefits to union workers.

4. Michigan's economy is already in the dumper and your actions are just making it worse. Of course, even though YOU Mr. Union Worker are to blame for your predicament, naturally being a union man and a liberal asshat, you'll blame it all on President Bush!

I would suggest that you accept whatever package is next offered to you and get your stupid butts back to work! I have NO SYMPATHY whatsoever if your family experiences any deprivation because you brought it on your own, shortsighted selves!
UPDATE: The strike was settled in 7 hours but now the Union is targeting Ford Motor Company, the weakest and most financially perilous of the former "Big Three" automakers.
A special salute to the dimbulb Chrysler union member who said, "I just want to protect what I've earned all these years!" You dopey female - the company goes bankrupt you'll be left with NOTHING WHATSOEVER! Want to rethink your attitude, lady?

Tuesday, October 09, 2007


BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID!

The woman is evil, the very personification of evil. The United States of America as we have known it all our lives could easily disappear, should this Spawn of Satan be elected to the Presidency. This duplicitous crone must be defeated and shown, at the ballot box, that her kind of sick, twisted, dishonest and despicable politician is no longer electable!

To the Dobsons of this world, I say unto you - do you want to have a tiny tantrum and show everyone what big ones you have? Or would you prefer to ACTUALLY save our nation from the Devil's handmaiden? Or to put it more bluntly - Dobson cut the crap! A third party candidacy is a ludicrous and just plain STUPID idea. Put on your grown-up BVDs and support any Republican candidate who can prevent this degenerate sack of excrement from being elected! THAT is the patriotic thing to do.

Monday, October 08, 2007

WHO SAID IT?



A little history lesson: If you don't know the answer make your best guess. Answer all the questions before looking at the answers. Who said it?

1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above

2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."
A. Lenin
B. Mussolini
C. Idi Amin
D. None of the Above

3) "(We)...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."
A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above

4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common ground."
A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above

5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."
A. Karl Marx
B. Lenin
C. Molotov
D. None of the above

6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."
A. Pinochet
B. Milosevic
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above

Answers:
(1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005

Be afraid, folks. Be VERY afraid!

h/t Tony Avak

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

BUT BEFORE I GO . .!


I may or may not have mentioned this opinion before, but General Wesley Clark is, in my view, the most textbook example of a horse's ass extant!

And now he has, out of his own dishonest mouth, provided all the proof a person needs:

From Townhall.com:

In a blog to the Huffington Post, former NATO Supreme Commander Wesley Clark called for Congress to immediately take steps to remove conservative radio personality Rush Limbaugh from Armed Forces Radio.

Last week, Rush Limbaugh labeled any American soldier who supports an end to the war in Iraq as "phony," noted Clark. "We challenged Limbaugh through an email campaign to invite VoteVets.org's Jon Soltz to his show and repeat these same insults to an Iraq war veteran's face. Over 10,000 people responded and emailed Rush -- but to our disappointment, he has refused to respond to our request.


Oh, for the love of God! This lying gasbag knows damned well that Rush Limbaugh wasn't referring to our American soldiers overall, but rather two SPECIFIC examples of NON-SOLDIERS who pretended to have served in Afghanistan or Iraq (in much the way that General Clark pretends to have a functional brain) and then lied about the activities of our military! Talk about cynical opportunism. That is rapidly becoming the only way to describe almost any Democrat!

And finally - did you ever notice how, whenever they are trying to pull the wool over American eyes, the Dems in Congress label their intrusive, wasteful and ultimately unnecessary programs as being "for the children"! I guess children that manage to get themselves born, in spite of the Democrats, take on some sort of mystical meaning!

"HELLO, I MUST BE GOING!"


I am moving into my new house this coming weekend and, as a consequence, blogging will be light to non-existent!

I'll be returning sometime toward the middle of next week.

Take care.
ANOTHER OUTRAGE FROM THE LEFT!


The traitorous left is under the mistaken impression that they can get Rush Limbaugh off of Armed Forces Radio and it's our job to show them it's pointless to even try such foolishness. Visit the feedback page at AFR and let them know you stand behind Rush and show continued support of the troops!

Pass the word around, blogs get to it.

Posted by Macranger on Tuesday, October 2nd, 2007 at 3:56 pm.

Here is the page you need to show your support.

Tuesday, October 02, 2007

ARE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC REALLY HEARING THESE SEDITIOUS TWITS!?


According to Fox News today, Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin feels that the Democrats "have had it with being maneuvered and jerked around" on the war in Iraq so he said he will not allow a bill to come for debate to provide emergency supplemental funds for the war and suggested Americans should be compelled to pay for it through a "surtax."

You seditious creep – who in the name of hell do you think is paying for the war NOW? Are you under the impression that money for that war is materializing in some great “government funds station” in the sky? The American people have paid for this war from the start . What a completely asinine and arrogantly self-righteous piece of stupidity for him to allow out of his mouth!

"The president isn't going to get a supplemental this year. I am not going to report a supplemental out" if it simply is a request for funds and not a change in direction for troops in Iraq,"

Obey said.

You just knock yourself out Rep. Obey. When the time comes for re-election, we WILL remember and be sure that your constituents who were credulous enough to vote you into office the last time, will be disgusted enough by your current ignorant blatheringss to vote you out of office. The nice thing about electing an idiot to the House is that you can get rid of your idiot fairly quickly.

TODAY'S "MUST READ" BLOG!


Doug Powers weighs in on the Harry Reid/Harkin/Rush Limbaugh flap today and his analysis is witty and brilliant which is a really cool combination any time! So please do head on over to Doug's location where you'll find the following gems:
In short, if Rush Limbaugh says or does anything reckless, he harms himself. If Harry Reid says or does anything reckless, he can harm a nation, and I believe he’s doing just that.

###

Rush Limbaugh issued a challenge to Harry Reid to come on his program and have it out. My own challenge to Reid and many other Democrats can be summed up in a sentence: If you would act as if terrorists are half as dangerous to the future of America as Rush Limbaugh, we might actually make some progress in our national security. If Rush Limbaugh ever gives up “the golden EIB microphone,” it shouldn’t be because an out-of-control politician hell-bent on silencing his detractors issued a totalitarian - esque decree - it should be because Limbaugh sold it, in an act of bipartisan charity, to pay for Mr. Reid’s straight-jacket and court-appointed psychiatrist. [emphasis added]

Monday, October 01, 2007

JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW THINGS WORK . .


When a Democratic Congressman defames American troops serving in a foreign country to protect our nation, that is the exercise of “Freedom of Speech”.

When a Conservative talk show host exposes a plethora of phony (as in NOT REAL or fraudulent) soldiers defaming American troops serving in a foreign country to protect our nation, that is the exercise of “Hate Speech” according to the Democrats.

The Democrats are once again trying to find a way to tinker with freedom of speech. Never mind that they indulge in LICENSE in this area, blathering any manner of uncivil, largely untrue and often defamatory or seditious nonsense – nobody is supposed to force them to justify or prove what they say!

That is – to put it mildly – b.s.!
R.I.P. BELOVED GIGI


Saturday at noon, Linda had the sad duty of euthanizing her beloved little female cat, Gigi. Gigi had a rich and interesting nearly 18 years on this planet and the beginning of the end was sudden and swift.

Gigi was originally the pampered little princess of Linda's mother. When Rita entered into her final illness, Gigi came to live with Linda and her then-fiance in Huntington Beach, California. Already resident in the household were two of the most wonderful Golden Retrievers anyone would ever want to meet, Amber and Cassis.


Now you have to understand, Gigi was an only child until that point and a totally inside cat. She didn't know what to make of these two enormous doggies, but rather quickly decided that she too was a Golden, to the point of sleeping with them in their doghouse! When I moved out to California for about 6 months and stayed with Linda and Doofus, Gigi was quite seriously annoyed that I brought my two boys, BooBoo and Rocky. She wanted nothing whatsoever to do with either of them and her attitude never changed. After all, SHE was a Golden Retriever!

When Linda moved cross country to Virginia, Gigi accompanied her in the moving truck, leading to one memorable episode during the trip when Gigi went into convulsions due to an excess of insulin in her little system. But all survived and for the past 8 years or so, Gigi has been a lady of Virginia, and she still had a dog - her beloved pit bull mix, Zeus, who loved her right back.
When I moved here, my two cats didn't know what to make of Gigi, who by this time was quite elderly, but still very much her own person. Sam was actively hostile (well - he's pretty much hostile to everyone but me at this juncture) and Timmy, ever the affable sweetheart, wanted to play with her. She wanted nothing whatsoever to do with THEM, but my lap was an instant destination and a frequent one.

The rapid onset of her illness left her, by late last week, completely blind and deaf as a yard of grass. I accompanied Linda to the vet on Saturday and Gigi has left to join her original family: Rita, Amber and Cassis. Our roommate swears he has heard her meow in the middle of the night, even though he knows she's no longer with us.

She was much loved, quite a personality, and a beautiful and loving (to people and dogs) companion. Linda is bereft, as am I, but with this post, I am celebrating the life of a wonderful companion and a very cool lady!

Rest in peace, sweetheart. Be seeing you.