Thursday, August 10, 2006

BAD TIMING!?


“So who’s going to tell Joe that he could very easily lose come November? Who’s going to tell him that Ned might actually be good for the Democratic Party?”
Susan Estrich, 8/09/06 on BlueStreak


Well, gee, Susan – since the apparent reason Joe Lieberman lost the primary is because of his stance on the War on Terror, I would say that after this morning’s events, Senator Lieberman is in pretty good shape.

And let’s see, Susan, since I can count and you apparently cannot – Senator Lieberman received 48% of the primary vote among Democrats. Care to hazard a guess, Susan, as to how many thoroughly furious Republicans there are in Connecticut who fully intend to vote for Senator Lieberman also?

No, Susan, just as you did when you ran Michael Dukakis’ campaign for president (And how is it that you are considered an “expert” on politics after THAT debacle?), you are completely misreading the intent and will of the American people. We don’t like defeatist cowards – which means that lately, we don’t much like Democrats. And I very much suspect that the voters of Connecticut are rightly going to be angered (if they are not already there) by out-of-state moonbats telling them how to vote!

My prediction? Senator Joseph Lieberman will return to the Senate as an Independent with an overwhelming majority of Connecticut voters sending him there. And in the process of this particular re-election campaign, he will have learned one valuable lesson – never trust the modern Democratic Party.

5 comments:

Sissy Willis said...

PLUS . . . The majority of Connecticut voters are Independents . . . AND, as my sis emailed me yesterday:

The Moonbats are going to field another George McGovern peace-nik candidate, and the Silent Majority will win in a landslide, just as they did way back when.

Gayle Miller said...

Great information Sissy!

Love to Baby and Tiny - they are such GORGEOUS critters! And of course to you and Tuck.

Anonymous said...

Susan Estrich lost all creditials (in my opinion) when she defended Clinton. She declared herself a "rape victim" but had no problem defending a rapist.I no longer take anything she says seriously.

HILLARYNEEDSAVACATION said...

"Susan Estrich"

eee ghad...

no wonder the Democrats are so confused...

i really enjoyed your post, especially the reality "never trust the modern Democratic Party..."

sadly it is very true...

best wishes.

Gull said...

Several comments have impressed me today -- yours is among them!