Thursday, October 22, 2009


Let's first eschew the reflexive "hell no" response of many who are delighted by Glenn Beck's virtual bomb throwing at the Left's agenda.

To me, the question can and should be divided into two categories. Rush Limbaugh is a wholly distinct category from Glenn Beck.

I cannot take Glenn Beck seriously. He is too much the naughty little boy dropping his britches in the public square to horrify his parents and scandalize the passing crowd. It doesn't mean that he gets his facts wrong, however, and so from that standpoint, I am of two minds about the Peck's Bad Boy of punditry. If he could dial back just a trifle on the outrageous locutions, he might be an effective mainstream pundit.

Rush Limbaugh has been around for what seems like forever. He is and always has been a burr under the saddle of any and all left-wing dopes trying to flimflam the American public into believing the latest load of bullshit being peddled by the great and [temporarily] powerful! Rush is Rahm Emanuel's worst nightmare and I'm sure it must be frustrating as hell to President Obama's nasty butt boy that he can't just wave his magic wand and wish Rush out of existence. Note to Rahm: Better men than you have tried, bucko, and have failed miserably! I don't always agree with Rush Limbaugh but I always love him and I always respect his intelligence and credentials as a conservative pundit. Demonizing him, as the White House is attempting to do, only makes him stronger.

All this White House posturing vis-a-vis Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News is by no means anything other than a miserably pathetic attempt to distract the American public (the right leaning portion of it anyway) from the fact that the Obama administration is attempting to frog march us into outright socialism at an astonishing clip! And no, neither Rush nor Glenn Beck pose any serious impediment to the Republicans recapturing a plethora of House and Senate seats in 2010. The case in favor of that happy prospect is being made quite capably by the White House and the current administration.

I am a conservative Republican woman; have been one all my life and am not in the least ashamed of my political stance. My question to anyone who is not a conservative is, why in hell not? What's wrong with your critical thinking apparatus? Are you daft?


Paul said...

The NFL decides who becomes an owner not the other way around.

All this blowhard (Rush Hudson Limbaugh A.KA. Jeff Christie) has to offer is his money and his opinions, (which in my opinion are on the fringes of racism, one mans opinion). There are many more groups biding for the Rams, not just his group. Lets face it there are more men with money (Marshall Faulk) that will gladly fill the slot and the Rams will win or lose depending on how well they work as a team and not on whether or not Rush is an owner.

As for Vick, well he is a player (he has talent not like you, Rush or I, unless you are a NFL player?) and he served his time and the NFL decided we live in the land of second chances, so why not (I personally don’t like it but, oh well). Life has never been fair (NEWS FLASH!)

Now as to the “Free Speech” argument, I guess many of you like myself heard Rush on Thursday “Almost in tears”, priceless. But the last couple of days he now is in his normal ranting and will continue until someone surpasses him, “Free Speech” continues, so what is being stifled, it simply is not true, of course, you may not have a radio, so you might want to get one.

PS – I am sure someone is working to put the tapes together maybe all you subscribers can help, since you are all about getting to the truth?

PPS- Beauty Pageant Judge – Now I understand why he lost the weight, to find a new wife, creepy.

Gayle Miller said...

The post is totally off topic! I mentioned nothing whatsoever in this post about the NFL debacle. Why anyone with any particle of sanity would want to buy any part of the Rams is beyond me. Georgia Frontierre damaged the team so thoroughly that it will be years before it recovers.